5. Vaccine “Science,” Cover-Up and Manipulation

The Vaccine Free Parenting MasterClass 5. Vaccine “Science,” Cover-Up and Manipulation

Vaccine “science,” cover-up and manipulation

A common strategy of the pro-vaccine cartel is to say that the “science is settled” and that all of the “science” is on the side of vaccination and that there is no “science” to support the anti-vaccine argument. However, in the real world, science is never “settled” and is always evolving. When the vaccine industry pays for its “science” to demonstrate “safety” or “efficacy” then what’s important to understand is that virtually any “scientific study” can be manipulated to desired results.

A perfect example of this is demonstrated in the documentary Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe where the CDC manipulated and destroyed its own findings that African American babies given the MMR vaccine prior to the age of 3 had a seven fold risk of developing autism. Not only did the CDC play trickery with its own data to make that “go away,” the CDC also ordered all documentation destroyed. Except one employee, William Thompson, kept the data and leaked it, which is what the documentary is about.

We must also keep in mind that OBSERVATION (e.g. when a parent notices an injury after vaccination) is critical to the “scientific method,” which is ignored by the pro-vaccine apologists.

The scientific method

At the core of biology and other sciences lies a problem-solving approach called the scientific method. The scientific method has five basic steps, plus one feedback step:

Make an observation.
Ask a question.
Form a hypothesis, or testable explanation.
Make a prediction based on the hypothesis.
Test the prediction.
Iterate: use the results to make new hypotheses or predictions.

The scientific method is used in all sciences—including chemistry, physics, geology, and psychology. The scientists in these fields ask different questions and perform different tests. However, they use the same core approach to find answers that are logical and supported by evidence.

https://www.khanacademy.org/science/high-school-biology/hs-biology-foundations/hs-biology-and-the-scientific-method/a/the-science-of-biology

Thus, PARENT OBSERVATIONS are scientific and should never be dismissed. When healthy children showing no symptoms of health issues then go get vaccinated, and then within hours, days or even weeks begin to have severe medical problems, neurological problems, emotional problems or other issues they did not have prior to the vaccines, then those parent observations should be taken seriously. But, they never are, because there is an agenda to force vaccinate every living creature “cradle-to-grave” and the liability-free vaccine industry continues to ensure that that agenda is protected at all cost.

So, do we have “science” on “our side” that shows vaccines are unsafe? Yes, we have hundreds of peer-reviewed studies, actually. Neil Z. Miller has compiled 400 of them into a book, Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies: 400 Important Scientific Papers Summarized for Parents and Researchers and I highly recommend this book to anyone who wants to review the science.

Manipulated Studies

The Vaxxed documentary discusses one specific study and the CDC’s destruction of data in an attempt to destroy the evidence that they know the MMR vaccine causes autism, but there’s a LOT more fraudulent studies or manipulated studies out there. Here are a couple examples:

One study excluded all cases where pregnant mothers lost their babies after vaccination and then declared that the vaccine is safe to administer in pregnancy >>> https://bit.ly/2ZyVlvL
In another study, researchers tested for blood and urine levels of aluminum in preterm infants before vaccines and 24 hrs after receiving aluminum-containing vaccines, and although they have no idea where all of the aluminum in the vaccines went, it didn’t show up in the blood stream or in urine 24 hours later, so… it’s all good! https://www.facebook.com/100000349373954/posts/2288750341146589
“Vaccines do not cause autism” claims come from:
- Studies only performed on one vaccine (MMR), and one ingredient (thimerosal). No studies on DTaP. No studies on aluminum adjuvants even though there are clear links between aluminum exposure and autism. No studies on the entire vaccine schedule.
- The majority of the studies used to defend the “no autism” claim were conducted by a CDC scientist-turned fugitive (Poul Thorsen) who was indicted on 22 counts of wire fraud and money laundering. He diverted over a million dollars to his personal bank account and fled to Denmark. https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/fugitives/profiles.asp/ https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/world-mercury-project-report-on-poul-thorsen-9-7-17.pdf
- Studies used in defense of vaccines are funded by the pharmaceutical industry. Example: most recent Danish study (ANOTHER study on MMR. Beating a dead horse to continue to publish garbage studies on MMR and autism…): https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2019/03/05/an-autopsy-on-hviid-et-al-2019s-mmr-vaccine-science-like-activities/ Chris Exley’s comments regarding this Danish study were also worth noting: https://bit.ly/30I3ITg (Go to “Comments” on this page.)

Another major issue is that mainstream media is either controlled by or owned by Pharma so there will never be any mainstream media investigation into the scientific fraud and cover-up by the vaccine industry. Robert F Kennedy Jr. has testified to the Vermont Health Care Committee that 70% of all news division revenues during non-election years come from pharmaceutical companies. https://youtu.be/j2UJ2oBeya0 Start @ 12:00 in.